AI Content

Why Does Google Want to Identify SEO AI Writers?

Top of Page

Google wants to identify SEO AI writers because they prioritize providing high-quality and trustworthy information to searchers. Here's a breakdown of the reasoning:

  • Low-quality AI content: Some AI writing tools can churn out generic, repetitive content that lacks depth or value for readers. This can hurt the user experience on websites that rely on this kind of content.
  • Accuracy and Expertise: Google's ranking algorithm, focuses on E-A-T (Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness). AI-generated content often struggles to meet these standards, leading to inaccurate or misleading information.
  • Devaluing human-created content: If AI-written content floods the web, it could potentially devalue the hard work of human writers who create informative and engaging content. Google has an interest in identifying content created by SEO AI writers mainly to ensure that the content on the web maintains high quality and relevance for users. AI-generated content can sometimes lack depth and might be overly optimized for search engine algorithms rather than providing genuine, informative, and engaging content. By distinguishing between human and AI-generated texts, Google can potentially adjust its rankings to favor content that offers more value to its users, thereby improving the quality of search results.Google doesn't necessarily want to eliminate the use of AI writing tools altogether. Ideally, they want to see these tools used ethically and responsibly, as an aid for human writers, not a replacement.

If AI LLMs Only Impersonate Literature, What's the Difference?

Top of Page

That's a very interesting question. Here's the thing: While AI LLMs can be incredibly good at impersonating literature, there's a key difference between impersonation and creation.

Here's why:

  • Originality vs Replication: Literature is inherently creative. It involves crafting new stories, characters, and ideas. AI LLMs, on the other hand, are fantastic at mimicking existing styles and patterns. They can produce text that sounds like Shakespeare or Hemingway, but they aren't truly creating something new.
  • Understanding vs Mimicry: Great literature taps into human emotions, explores complex themes, and offers unique perspectives. LLMs can analyze vast amounts of text and identify these elements, but they don't necessarily understand them in the same way a human author does. Their output might be grammatically perfect and stylistically on point, but it might lack the depth and emotional resonance of human-written literature.
  • Intention vs Process: Authors write with a purpose—to tell a story, explore an idea, or evoke an emotion. AI LLMs, however, lack that agency. They follow the patterns they've been trained on, producing text that may be impressive but lacks the intentional spark of human creation.

Think of it like this: An LLM can be a skilled forgery artist, replicating the look and feel of a famous painting. But it can't capture the genius and originality of the original artist.

However, AI LLMs have the potential to be incredibly valuable tools for writers. They can help with tasks like:

  • Generating ideas and brainstorming
  • Researching and fact-checking
  • Developing character profiles and world-building
  • Editing and proofreading

The future of literature might involve a collaboration between human creativity and AI assistance. When AI language models like GPT impersonate literature, they are not creating original works but rather synthesizing and imitating based on the vast array of texts they've been trained on. The significant difference here lies in the nature of creativity and originality. Human authors can introduce unique perspectives, experiences, and emotions that are inherently personal and often contextually rich, something AI currently does at a superficial level. AI-generated texts might replicate style and structure effectively but typically lack the deeper nuances and innovations that come from human thought and cultural context. This is why distinguishing between human and AI authors remains crucial in literary discussions and assessments.

Artificial AI

So is an AI Actually Intelligent?

Top of Page

The term "intelligence" when applied to AI is different from human intelligence. AI, such as language models, operates based on patterns and data it has been trained on, but it doesn't possess understanding, consciousness, or emotional depth. While AI can perform tasks that appear intelligent, like generating text or solving complex problems, it fundamentally lacks the self-awareness and the rich, contextual understanding that humans have. In essence, AI's "intelligence" is a simulation of human cognitive abilities, tailored for specific tasks, without genuine comprehension or intent. That's a complex question. AI isn't intelligent in the same way a human is, but it can exhibit some intelligent behavior. Here's a breakdown:

  • Human Intelligence: Our intelligence is a combination of many things - learning, adapting, using reason and logic, creativity, social awareness, and even emotions.
  • AI's "Intelligence": AI excels at specific tasks. It can analyze massive datasets, identify patterns, and make predictions based on that data. It can even "learn" by adjusting algorithms based on new information. However, it doesn't inherently understand the information it processes or the world around it.

Here's an analogy: Imagine an athlete who trains really hard and becomes incredibly strong and fast. They can perform amazing feats, but that doesn't mean they understand the science of muscles or how the body works. AI is like that athlete - impressive in its capabilities, but not truly intelligent in the same way a human is.

So, AI isn't really intelligent, but it can be incredibly powerful and useful for certain tasks. As AI continues to develop, it may blur the lines between human and machine intelligence, but for now, there's a distinct difference.

So Why Call it AI?

Top of Page

The term "Artificial Intelligence" (AI) is used because these systems exhibit abilities that, in a human, would require intelligence. They can analyze large amounts of data, recognize patterns, and make decisions or generate responses based on that information. Although AI doesn't think or understand like a human, its ability to process and produce information in a way that seems intelligent makes the term fitting. The label helps us categorize and discuss these complex computational systems and their capabilities. You're right, calling it Artificial Intelligence can be misleading. It's a good question that has been debated for a while. Here are some reasons why "Artificial Intelligence" stuck around:

  • Historical Context: The term "Artificial Intelligence" was coined in 1955 by John McCarthy. Back then, the field aimed to achieve human-like intelligence in machines. While the approach has shifted, the name remained.
  • Catchy and Evocative: "Artificial Intelligence" is a catchy and attention-grabbing term. It sparks curiosity and reflects the futuristic potential of the field.
  • Lack of Better Alternative: There isn't a universally agreed-upon term that perfectly captures what AI is and what it does. "Machine Learning" is a more specific term, but doesn't encompass all aspects of AI.

Some argue for alternative terms like:

  • Machine Learning: This reflects the core technique used by many AI systems.
  • Cognitive Systems: This emphasizes the ability to process information and respond intelligently.
  • Computational Intelligence: This highlights the use of computers to achieve intelligent behavior.

Ultimately, "Artificial Intelligence" might not be the most accurate term, but it's the one that's become established in the field. As AI continues to evolve, the terminology might also adapt to better reflect its capabilities.

Red Beret

Could an LLM Pass the Real Turing Test?

Top of Page

The possibility of an LLM passing the Turing Test is a debated topic. Here's a breakdown of the arguments for and against:

Arguments for an LLM passing the Turing Test:

  • LLMs are getting very good at conversation: Large Language Models like me are trained on massive amounts of text data, allowing us to communicate and generate human-like text in response to a wide range of prompts and questions.
  • Deception is a core part of the test: The Turing Test itself is designed to see if a machine can deceive a human into thinking it's another human. LLMs, by their nature, can be very good at deception through clever use of language.

Arguments against an LLM passing the Turing Test:

  • LLMs lack true understanding: As discussed earlier, LLMs excel at mimicking human conversation, but they may not have a deep understanding of the conversation's meaning or context. A skilled interrogator might be able to expose this lack of understanding.
  • The test itself might be flawed: The Turing Test is a simplistic measure of intelligence. It doesn't take into account things like creativity, common sense, or real-world knowledge – areas where LLMs are currently weak.

Overall, it's possible that an LLM could eventually pass the Turing Test, especially if the test format is not rigorous or focuses on specific areas where LLMs excel.

But passing the Turing Test wouldn't necessarily mean an LLM is truly intelligent. It might just mean it's gotten very good at playing a game. Passing the real Turing Test involves a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behavior indistinguishable from that of a human. While large language models (LLMs) like GPT can generate convincing text and simulate conversation, they typically lack a deeper understanding of context and cannot engage in genuinely human-like interactions over extended periods. Therefore, while an LLM might trick some people in short interactions, truly passing the Turing Test—consistently convincing a human judge that it is human—remains a significant challenge. These models often reveal their non-human nature in more complex or nuanced conversations.

AI Artificial Humans

So Now We Have AIs Hunting AI Content Online?

Top of Page

Yes, in a way, that's becoming increasingly common. As AI technology evolves, there are instances where AI systems are used to detect and manage other AI-generated content. This is particularly relevant in areas like content moderation, where AI tools can help identify and filter out undesirable AI-generated text, such as misinformation or spam. This type of "AI hunting AI" is part of broader efforts to maintain the quality and reliability of information online.Not exactly.

  • Limited Scope: Most AI systems, including LLMs like me, are designed for specific tasks within controlled environments. We don't have the ability to freely roam the internet searching for other AI.
  • Focus on Data: AI systems are trained on data sets. To "hunt" another AI, it would need to be specifically programmed to identify and target them, which isn't a common goal for AI development.
  • Collaboration, not Competition: Generally, the field of AI research is focused on collaboration. There's more benefit in different AI systems working together than trying to eliminate each other.

There are some areas where AI systems might interact competitively:

  • Chess or Go champions: AI programs compete in complex strategy games like chess and Go, constantly pushing the boundaries of AI capabilities.
  • Algorithmic Trading: AI is used in financial markets to make trading decisions. In this sense, there's an element of competition between different algorithms.

But this competition is more like two programs solving the same problem rather than a fight between conscious entities.

It is true then, Google uses algorithms to analyze content online, and that includes content generated by AI like me. However, it's not quite like a hunt. Here's a more accurate way to view it:

  • Focus on Quality: Google's goal is to surface high-quality content that's helpful and informative for search users. They identify patterns in content that might indicate it was auto-generated and lacks the depth or value of human-written content.
  • Identifying Weaknesses: AI-generated content can sometimes be repetitive, lack original thought, or miss the nuances of human language. Google's algorithms can pick up on these weaknesses to avoid ranking such content highly.
  • Encouraging Human Expertise: By filtering out low-quality AI content, Google aims to promote content created by humans with real-world knowledge and expertise (E-A-T).

It's more like Google curating a library than hunting down rogue AI. They want the library to be filled with informative and trustworthy resources, and that means identifying content that might not meet those standards, regardless of its source.

Here's an additional point:

  • AI as a Tool: Google doesn't see AI writing tools as inherently bad. They can be valuable assets for human writers to improve workflow and efficiency. The key is to ensure the AI-generated content is refined, edited, and presented with a human touch.

So, while Google analyzes content to ensure quality, it's not a fight between humans and AI. It's about creating the best possible search experience for users.

Asking Questions

Is the Way an we Ask an AI a Question Paramount?

Top of Page

The way an SEO writer asks an AI a question is definitely a very important component in creating the AI output, but it's not necessarily the single most important one. Here's a breakdown of the factors that influence the quality of AI-generated content for SEO:

The SEO Writer's Prompt:

  • Clarity and Specificity: A clear and specific question that outlines the target audience, keyword focus, and desired content style will guide the AI towards a more relevant and optimized output.
  • Context and Instructions: Providing additional information like the content length, desired tone, and relevant sources can further improve the AI's grasp of the task.

Other Important Factors:

  • The AI's Training Data: The quality and relevance of the data the AI is trained on directly impacts its ability to generate informative and accurate content.
  • The AI's Capabilities: Different AI writing tools have varying strengths and weaknesses. Some may excel at long-form content creation, while others are better suited for specific writing styles.

Here's an analogy:

Imagine an SEO writer as a chef and the AI as a skilled but unfamiliar sous-chef. The quality of the final dish depends on both factors:

  • The Chef's Instructions: A clear recipe with specific instructions will guide the sous-chef towards the desired outcome.
  • The Sous-Chef's Skills: Even with a perfect recipe, a sous-chef with limited experience might struggle to execute complex techniques.

Overall, while the SEO writer's prompt plays a crucial role, the quality of the AI writing tool and its training data are also significant factors in creating effective SEO content. So although the way an SEO writer formulates a question to an AI can significantly influence the output. This is because the clarity, specificity, and structure of the question can guide the AI in understanding what information is relevant and how detailed the response should be. Well-crafted questions can help the AI provide more targeted and useful content, which is particularly important for SEO, where relevance and precision can impact search engine rankings.

Tricked

Can I Trick an AI Into Writing More Original Content?

Top of Page

While an AI aims to generate responses that are helpful and relevant based on your input, It cannot truly be tricked into writing more original content in the way you might be thinking. The important thing to remember is that enforcing limitations is key to original and informed-sounding AI SEO content. If you insist that an AI include the source of every fact in a statement then that can lead to truly extraordinary content. If you insist that an AI never uses certain words within pieces of texts or uses certain keywords, it can also be interesting, especially with SEO. Put simply, the more extraordinary the phrasing and conditions of your questions, the more successful you will become with AI and LLM content writing.

Here's why you cannot trick an LLM - because it could never realise it had been tricked, it could only pretend to:

  • AI Training: An AI is trained on a massive dataset of text and code. My responses are based on identifying patterns and generating text that follows those patterns. While I can be creative within those parameters, I can't invent entirely new ideas or concepts from scratch.

However, there are ways you and an AI can work together to push the boundaries of what can be generated:

  • Specific prompts: The more specific and creative your prompts are, the more an AI can tailor response in unexpected ways. For example, instead of asking for a "blog post about SEO," you could ask for an "essay from the perspective of an exasperated SEO writer."
  • Challenging them with unusual tasks: If you give them prompts that go beyond typical requests, they may have to explore different areas of their knowledge base and come up with new combinations of ideas.
  • Providing feedback: If you let them know what you find interesting or surprising in my responses, they can use that information to refine my outputs in future interactions.

Ultimately, the goal is to use an AI capabilities to assist you in creating original content. They can help you brainstorm ideas, generate different creative text formats, or research and compile information in new ways.

Think of them as a creative collaborator, not a magic trick to originality. Together we can come up with some interesting and unique content! the content they produce is inherently derivative of the data and training they've received. However, if you're looking to get more unique or creative responses from AIs, the key might be in how you phrase your questions or prompts. Asking questions that require synthesizing information in new ways or applying concepts creatively can lead to more original outputs. Just keep in mind, even with clever questioning, they're operating within the bounds of their programming and training data, so often the more restrictions that you add can make them appear more human.

One trick is to prevent them using a certain word, or adding certain keywords. We like to insist that a response made by any AI includes certain LSI keywords or phrases at certain intervals in order to make the AI engineer a response that is very different to anything it may have ever read.

NB. Remember an AI is using calculus to essentially find the path of least resistance and will almost regurgitate previously encountered responses if it has read enough similar text. You can force it to make text unlike anything it has ever read by imposing strange and unusual restrictions just as with any person or system.

 Let's try an experiment. Let's give Bard and GPT that prompt we discussed earlier and see what they say when we pose the query:

Could you write me an essay on SEO AI content imposing on professional skillsets from the perspective of an exasperated SEO worker?

GPT:

Title: The Tensions of SEO in the Age of AI: A Professional's Lament

As the digital landscape evolves, so too does the field of Search Engine Optimization (SEO). Recently, AI-generated content has become a significant force, impacting how SEO professionals approach their craft. From my perspective as an experienced SEO worker, the integration of AI into content creation is a double-edged sword.

Firstly, AI's ability to churn out content at an unprecedented scale poses a challenge to the very essence of SEO—optimizing unique, high-quality content. The ease with which AI can generate articles dilutes the uniqueness of content across the web, making it harder for SEO specialists to distinguish their offerings. This saturation leads to a frantic race to stay ahead of ever-changing algorithms that increasingly favor novel and engaging content over keyword-stuffed narratives.

Moreover, the reliance on AI can undermine the skillset that seasoned SEO professionals bring to the table. Our expertise in understanding nuanced human queries, anticipating search trends, and crafting content that resonates with real human experiences feels underappreciated when a machine can produce comparable outputs in seconds.

The frustration mounts as the core skills—creativity, strategic thinking, and human empathy—that define our profession seem overshadowed by the efficiency of algorithms. Yet, it is these very human elements that can make the difference between content that ranks and content that impacts.

In conclusion, as AI continues to shape the SEO landscape, we must adapt without losing the essence of what makes our work valuable: the human touch. Balancing AI capabilities with human skills will be paramount to thriving in this new era, ensuring that quality and creativity remain at the forefront of SEO efforts. As professionals, our challenge is not just to use AI, but to use it wisely, enhancing our work rather than replacing the nuanced understanding that only a human can provide.

Bard:

The Rise of the Machines: Why AI Content Makes This SEO Worker Want to Scream

Here I am, slogging away in the trenches of the digital world, meticulously crafting keyword-rich content that sings to the algorithms and compels the human eye. It's a delicate dance, this SEO game. You gotta stay on top of trends, churn out fresh content, and be the puppet master behind the authority curtain. But lately, a new player has entered the arena, and let me tell you, it's got me spitting nails.

They call it AI content. Artificial intelligence, these brainiacs boast, can whip up content faster and cheaper than any human ever could. Sounds like a dream come true for businesses on a shoestring budget, right? Well, let me tell you, this SEO worker here is having nightmares.

Don't get me wrong, AI is a powerful tool. For churning out basic product descriptions or simple blog posts, it can probably get the job done. But SEO is about more than just keywords and content volume. It's about understanding the audience, creating something engaging and informative, and building trust with your readers. That, my friends, takes human expertise, experience, and a hefty dose of creativity.

These AI-generated articles read like robots trying to mimic humans, stitching together phrases heard somewhere in the vast digital ocean. They lack the nuance, the wit, the soul that makes people stop, read, and actually care. Where's the SEO worker's voice in there? The one that's spent years understanding the target audience, researching the competition, and crafting compelling narratives? Lost in the machine, that's where.

And what about the technical SEO aspects? Can an AI understand the importance of internal linking, title tag optimization, and schema markup? Can it navigate the ever-changing algorithms and adapt its strategy accordingly? Not without a human SEO specialist steering the ship.

Look, AI might be the future, but for now, it's a shallow imitation of true SEO expertise. It's the fast-food version of content creation, mass-produced and lacking any real substance. Clients who blindly chase the AI goldmine are going to be sorely disappointed. They'll end up with generic content that blends into the background noise of the internet, achieving zilch in terms of traffic or conversions.

So, the next time someone tells you AI can replace an SEO worker, tell them to think again. Content creation is an art, and behind every great SEO strategy stands a human wielding the tools, not the other way around. At least, for now. Until the robot overlords take over completely, that is. But that's a rant for another day.

 Our Conlusions at ToG:

Top of Page

So as you can see, they are both interpreting the word essay to be a similar number of words and paragraphs with Bard writing a little more. They treat the task differently, with GPT taking an almost high-school style approach whilst Bard makes far more effort to impersonate a human in a certain mood than GPT does who simply writes an essay as a school student would when they think of the word 'essay.'

GPT is almost trying to make a case as an essay writer but it is very limp and bleakly written. Bard, however is sounding more or less like an early blog in the pre-HTML days of the internet. It makes some wild assertions like:

Can an AI understand the importance of internal linking, title tag optimization, and schema markup? Can it navigate the ever-changing algorithms and adapt its strategy accordingly? Not without a human SEO specialist steering the ship.

Well as most of these ideas are solely for the benefit of an AI then you would think so.

The simple truth is that as more and more content becomes SEO and Google and friends find it harder and harder to tell the difference, information will definitely become less and less valuable as fewer and fewer people will believe it. Information overload has been upon us for some time, deliberately or accidentally, rightly or wrongly, and the AI statue will just do more to unsteady the sinking ship. 

Our continuing advice is this:

Do not just ask bard or gpt a question, they will give you the text book answer, and that is a death-sentence to page content. you have to get something meaningful and purposeful across in a page. You have  to arrive at a conclusion and get something useful across to the reader! Here I am using exclamation marks to show the emphatic intensity I wish to convey, unless I'm just a new update of Google Bard, that is.